Twas the Night for the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet


Advertisement



Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You are able to bet on it! (Image: zombieapocalypse.com)

Every year punters place bets on whether or not they’ll get up up to a blanket that is snowy their roads on Christmas morning. It’s the old romantic in each of us that longs for this scenic backdrop to a joyous day, surrounded by our liked ones and overeating with all the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and spreading our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

While many are betting on a white Christmas, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this xmas being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is a good, festive idea to have, and beats the odds they offer for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League this year at 5000/1. Speak about harmful gambling.

‘we are quite confident that the odds of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they ought not to be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and consume the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Chances on a Christmas that is white currently at 5/1, which is a much better chance compared to those offered on the doomsday coming of this undead, and you’re much more likely in order to claim your winnings after a little bit of snow as opposed to needing to fight your way through the zombie hordes to gather your reward. Although you would certainly be pretty smug with yourself if you’ve got that bet right, that’s without a doubt.

While the chance to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is significantly more than probably a nice bit of publicity for Ladbrokes, Sean Page zombie specialist and founder for the Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to organize for the worst.

‘The public is always interested in the chances of the white Christmas time, however they should be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of a Zombie Apocalypse,’ claimed Page, suggesting, perhaps, that he is nipping at the whiskey by having a bit way too much alacrity.

‘The most time that is likely an outbreak is throughout the busy holiday season as people save money time in large groups, which makes it easier for the zombie virus to distribute, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page included. Evidently, he’s seen it happen prior to.

Bets That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems too low for the probability of a zombie epidemic really, but this is simply not the time that is first has offered the chance to place wagers on the Apocalypse, because they additionally offered equivalent chances on the outbreak of an undead siege on December 21st 2012, due to all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in expectation of their impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are additionally providing much more likely odds of 500/1 on the probability of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, but the smart profit this instance would probably be in the zombies, even though that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the, you know, end of the world and all that. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead away from hinged door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Nevertheless Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Just whenever you thought nobody would ever be good enough for Massachusetts’ insanely fastidious gaming payment, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative arm which may have its TV that is own series ‘MGC P.I.’ suggested that MGM Resorts be found suitable to progress with their Springfield casino task, with the caveat that MGM executives find a way to talk their way away from a few lingering issues associated with commission, concerns that came to light when the commission conducted its regulatory background check regarding the casino company.

Cleared for Remove

We aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent the past 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from setting up house in the pristine state of Massachusetts when we say ‘lengthy.

But it’s not a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the last term on whether or not MGM is going to be able to do business within their neck regarding the forests. But if they give their papal blessing towards the company, MGM will then manage to submit their last application as the one and only western Massachusetts casino license that is going to be provided; and since they’re truly the only remaining applicant, that would seem to be always a pretty done deal.

Truly the only tiny ding that the Bureau could find out after nearly a year of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the topic was MGM’s method of dealing former executive board member Terry Christensen, who in 2008 was convicted on fees involving the wiretapping of company mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian had been involved in a child support fight that is gruesome.

‘Despite his indictment, resignation through the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was allowed to engage, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in some delicate and non-public corporate issues of MGM Resorts … including his attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate with all the Commission at this week’s hearing, noting that it absolutely was an error for the company to allow bad boy Christensen to keep in every capacity with the business.

‘I exercised judgment that is poor’ said Murren, who had previously been the outfit’s CFO whenever all this went down. ‘It was an idea that is bad the very beginning. None of us should have had any experience of (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren wasn’t the only person to throw himself in the mercy associated with the court, as current MGM board member (and head of its review committee) Roland Hernandez produced point to tell commissioners that protocols are now in position within the company to ensure here will likely to be no repeats of this poor decision-making process.

All which was then kept for the megabucks winner rampart casino commish to deal with were several questions they had about some MGM transactions in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese business mogul (and child of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as somebody during a 2010 New Jersey hearing that is regulatory the situation, and also as such, MGM had to unload a 50 percent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, just to keep their nose clean. The allegations had been that Ho’s father Stanley had had transactions with some gangs that are chinese a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been included with MGM completely split from her father, and that she was mainly involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been okay with the Ho interaction; particularly, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no problem along with it. He additionally noted that New Jersey has now softened their own stance, and may allow MGM back to the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later this week; the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby will not say which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness when controling these issues.

But even being the only applicant and even when cleared by the commission this it’s still not a 100 percent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts week.

‘One applicant or 10, we shall hold their feet to the fire to make sure we have application that is really good’ Crosby recommended reporters throughout a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as New Jersey Bars Licensing for just two Years

PokerStars got a smack from nj regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week

If there’s one name that has dominated the American on line poker market over the decade that is last it has to be PokerStars. But if you’re living in nj-new jersey, you mustn’t expect you’ll be playing on a site operated by the poker giant any time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The nj-new Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made the decision this to suspend the review of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling license for two years, effectively locking the company out of the state’s online poker marketplace for that time period week.

‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the application of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino service industry licensure (CSIE) will likely be in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division said in a statement.

However, the door is not totally closed on PokerStars.

‘The Division, within that period, may consider a request for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, of which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars and its entities that are affiliated associated individuals will likely be resumed to assess suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled the federal government to its case and admitted no wrongdoing as part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have some issues with the company. Chief among those appears to be their association with founder Isai Scheinberg, who has been under federal indictment since Black Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and have not come to your U.S. to face those costs, to nobody’s shock.

While this is a huge loss for PokerStars, it also marks a big win because of its competitors in the New Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently possesses 50 percent share of the state’s poker marketplace, because of the Caesars/888 World Series of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could easily have been overshadowed by the PokerStars site which will have now been operated along with Resorts Casino and were hoping that their head start would give them a plus that allows them to remain competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to produce brand commitment, something that PokerStars may have a hard time conquering, if when they truly are finally certified for New Jersey’s online market.

PokerStars had been predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that hawaii’s decision could improvement in the long term.

‘Our company is disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the overview of our application if our circumstances change. We shall remain in open dialogue with the DGE and certainly will update them on changes in our situation because they occur.’

This wasn’t the first disappointing result for PokerStars in New Jersey. Formerly, the company had attempted to get the Atlantic Club Casino, just to have that deal break apart over questions about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That choice ended up being also expensive, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they’d spent on casino expenses a total that was meant to be used to your eventual $15 million cost.

Adverts

Leave a Comment

Geo Kahani best Pakistani TV Drama channel